My Photo

Projects & Affiliates

September 2007

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Blogs 'n' Stuff on SustainLane US City Rankings

(c) Copyright 2007 SustainLane

  • Warren Karlenzig works at SustainLane. He is not responsible for any user-generated Content or links that show up on his blog. Also, what he says represents SustainLane, and he is protected by SustainLane.

« SustainLane Launches Best Practice Knowledge Base for U.S. Cities | Main | NYC Goes Green Big Time »

September 27, 2006

Cities with good public transit earn more in rent than their suburbs: WSJ

Today's Wall Street Journal has a great article "Downtown, Where the Price is Right." The article cites a new study comparing office rents in major U.S. cities compared to surrounding suburbs. The cities where downtown rents fetch the highest premium over their 'burbs:

1. Manhattan;  2. Boston; 3. Washington, D.C.; 4. Chicago;  5. Montreal; 6. San Francisco

And the cities where suburbs fetch the highest premium compared to downtown city rents:

1. St. Louis; 2. Oklahoma City; 3. Phoenix; 4. Kansas City, MO; 5. (tied) Detroit, Nashville, Philadelphia

One key difference between the top group and the bottom group is that NY, Boston, DC, Chicago and SF have the nation's highest rates of commuters who takes public transit to work and who walk to work.

In St. Louis, OK City, Phoenix, Kansas City and Nashville rates of public transit use are much lower--Nashville and Oklahoma City's public transit use rates are about 1%, and St. Louis' is the highest at about 10%. Compare to NY, DC, SF and Boston, which have commute-to-work on transit rates of 30-50%. Walk-to-work rates for these cities are about half or less of NY, DC, SF, etc. (The outlier is Philly with a high public transit use rate and walk to work rate, but with downtown renting for 6% less than suburban office space)

My point: cities need to have strong public transit and walkability to be desirable. Said the research director for the study, "These are all areas that evoke prestige and provide superior high-quality public transit, are generally considered safe and all seem to contain inviting, pedestrian-friendly public spaces."

What's especially fascinating is that vacancy rates aren't such a big factor. Chicago may have a 16% office space vacancy rate in its downtown, but it still can fetch 41% more in office space rent per square foot than can its suburbs.

Take note city planners and policymakers: public transit and walkability mean bigger bucks for business, tourism, and more money for tax rolls. We don't need to even get into the air pollution and global climate change caused by all that driving in the transit-poor cities, do we?

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834527c3f69e200d835267eb269e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cities with good public transit earn more in rent than their suburbs: WSJ:

Comments

Chicago also has excellent Charter bus service. Sometimes companies rent 2 or 3 per day to transfer their employees to the train stations

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Events Calendar

Previous Posts

WorldChanging

Joel Makower: Two Steps Forward